🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of states are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the local level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, additional states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that states globally are less and less content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.